萌学园

What the West's assimilation accusations against China reveal about its own historical burdens_我的网站

绿光森林

一 | (ECNS)-- China's newly implemented Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law has elicited a predictable response from certain Western media outlets. Whenever ethnic unity is referenced, some Western critics rush to frame it as "assimilation" or a push for uniform national identity. Fan Yichou, associate professor at the Law School of Minzu University of China, argues that such misinterpretations arise primarily from projecting Western historical nation-state building trajectories onto China's ethnic policies. Put simply, some Western observers do not view China from the perspective of its domestic social realities, but rather judge it through the lens of their own historical experience. Fan argued that the traditional Western nation-state model rests on a core premise: one ethnic community ought to align with one sovereign state, with political boundaries largely overlapping ethnic territories. To build culturally homogeneous nation-states, most Western powers historically sought to eradicate internal ethnic diversity through assimilation, exclusion, and other coercive measures. Such nation-building drives were often accompanied by territorial conquest, mass population displacement, and systemic violence. He drew on arguments laid out by Canadian political philosopher Will Kymlicka, who observes that the classical European template of nation-building rested on an implicit consensus: states should strive to become culturally homogeneous, by either assimilating national minorities or expelling them. For centuries, this ideal of a mono-national state shaped state policy across almost all Western European countries, with Switzerland stands out as the only major exception. This deep-rooted historical trajectory continues to frame contemporary discourse on ethnic governance. A stark modern illustration emerged in 2025, when Danish local authorities took away the newly-born daughter of an 18-year-old Inuit mother from Greenland just one hour after birth following a controversial parenting competency assessment. Her case was far from isolated. According to reports by the BBC and other media outlets, another Greenlandic mother had all three of her children under state custody. She was first subjected to a so-called parenting competency test after social services raised concerns about the language development of her eldest daughter. Although the Danish government has decided to stop using such tests on Greenlandic families, local authorities have yet to halt the practice. The enduring harm of assimilationist policies extends far beyond this Danish case. UNESCO’s Memory of the World archives document that Canada's Indigenous residential school system continuously operated for nearly 150 years, with the explicit state objective of assimilating Indigenous children into settler society. Generations of Indigenous children were forcibly separated from their families, severed from their ancestral languages, cultural traditions, and intergenerational knowledge systems. The United States has grappled with comparable challenges. According to a 2025 Associated Press report, Native American children in California are roughly about four times more likely to enter the foster-care system than their peers. Newborns separated from their mother shortly after birth. Generations of children torn apart from their families and ancestral languages. Indigenous youth who remain vastly overrepresented in foster-care placements to this day. All these are legacies of the West's long-standing obsession with assimilation. That explains why, when some in the West hear China speak of "ethnic unity," they instinctively equate it with "assimilation." In reality, they are projecting their own social trauma onto China. China's context, however, is fundamentally different. As Fan Yichou notes, China has long been a unified multi-ethnic country. Within the Chinese tradition, political unity has not demanded cultural uniformity. Instead, unity and diversity have coexisted across most of the nation's history. This outlook finds theoretical expression in the concept of plurality-in-unity put forward by renowned Chinese sociologist Fei Xiaotong. In his framework, China's 56 ethnic groups represent the plurality, whereas the Chinese nation embodies unity. From this perspective, the Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law is not designed to eliminate ethnic differences. Instead, it seeks to strengthen a shared sense of belonging while respecting cultural diversity. This distinction highlights a broader divergence between China and the West in approaching identity and social cohesion. In many Western societies, historical assimilation sought to diminish group differences and compel minority groups to conform to dominant-culture norms. By contrast, China's emphasis on forging a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation is not intended to obliterate diversity. It seeks to build shared civic and national identity, while enabling all ethnic groups to sustain their own languages, customs, and cultural traditions. Ethnic groups may speak different languages, practice different customs, and vary in development level. Yet they can still uphold shared dedication to national progress and a common sense of belonging within a unified multi-ethnic state. Genuine ethnic unity does not require everyone to fit into the same mold. It means ensuring that different ethnic groups can participate in national development while maintaining their own cultural characteristics and thriving with equal dignity and equitable opportunities. So when some in the West equate China's "ethnic unity" with "assimilation," their judgment stems not from an accurate assessment of China’s reality, but from a subconscious projection of their own historical burdens, contemporary social anxieties, and deep-rooted institutional scars onto China's ethnic policies. They are either unwilling or unable to fully comprehend China's governance philosophy and practices, yet arbitrarily pass arrogant judgment on the country. The outcome of this biased approach will be no exception of absurd narratives that fundamentally contradict objective reality. 。 [앵커]실종 사건을 허위로 종결한 혐의로 구속된 경찰관은 여자화장실에 침입한 혐의로도 수사를 받고 있는데 당시 화장실 천장 등 손이 잘 닿지 않는 곳에 신원을 알 수 없는 지문이 발견된 것으로 파악됐습니다.이건 또 무슨 일인지, 김태준 기자가 취재했습니다. [리포트]지난달 22일 제주서부경찰서.故 장미란 씨 가족이 서울로 경유해 재차 실종신고를 접수한 지 사흘 만에, 이 경찰서에선 불미스러운 사건이 벌어졌습니다.남성 경찰관이 여자화장실에 침입했다가 여직원과 마주친 겁니다.해당 경찰관은 다름 아닌 장씨 실종 사건 담당 경장이었습니다.여직원 신고로 분리 조치가 내려지면서 해당 경장은 실종팀에서 지구대로 발령났습니다.제주서부경찰서 관계자"그 당시 여자 화장실에 누가 있었던 게 아니고 그냥 나오다가 나오다가 저기 뭐야 여직원하고 마주친 거라 그때 급한 나머지 화장지가 없어서 그쪽으로 갔다라고 하니까…."해당 경장은 "화장실이 급해 들어갔다"는 취지로 진술했습니다.제주서부경찰서 관계자"현장 감식 다 했습니다. 몰카 탐지도 해봤는데 특이사항은 없었어요."그런데, 현장 감식 과정에서 화장실 천장에 손자국이 발견된 것으로 전해졌습니다.경찰은 누구의 손자국인지 지문을 확인 중인 것으로 알려졌습니다.경찰 관계자"저희들은 (지문 발견) 확인도 부정도 하지 않고 있습니다. 지금 그 상황이고 수사와 관련된 부분이라서…."경찰은 조만간 해당 경장을 불러 여자화장실에 들어간 이유 등을 조사할 예정입니다.TV조선 김태준입니다.。